Revisiting the Dormitory: How Hypnotherapy and Inner Child Work Support Adults with Boarding School Syndrome

This article was published in the "The Hypnotherapist" The journal for clinical hypnotherapists in practice - Autumn 2025

Introduction

Boarding School Syndrome (BSS) is a term used to describe the long-term effects of early separation and institutional living. Many adults who attended boarding schools report patterns such as perfectionism, emotional distance, struggles with intimacy, and a lingering sense of loss. Writers in the psychodynamic tradition have described in detail how the culture of boarding schools encourages self-reliance, performance, and emotional restraint, often at the cost of vulnerability and authentic connection (Schaverien, 2011; Schaverien, 2015; Duffell, 2000). It is important to note that not all former boarders experience these difficulties; the term is used here to describe the presentations of those adults who come to therapy with these particular challenges. Research is beginning to back this up: one recent study found that the earlier a child went to boarding school, the more likely they were to experience attachment insecurity in adulthood, along with lower perceptions of parental care (Wharton and Marcano-Olivier, 2023). Despite this, hypnotherapy has not featured much in the existing literature, even though it is well placed to address many of these patterns.

A developmental perspective can help us understand why these experiences echo into adult life. Prolonged separations from caregivers and highly structured institutional routines can disrupt attachment learning and affect regulation (Bowlby, 1969). Studies on early deprivation also show that disruptions in caregiving can have long-lasting consequences (Rutter et al., 1998). In therapy, purely verbal approaches may not fully reach the implicit, body-based child states that continue to influence adult behaviour, whereas imagery and experiential methods can help bring these states into awareness and offer opportunities for healing (Holmes and Mathews, 2010).

Hypnotherapy provides a way to do this safely and effectively. Working within an ego-state framework, hypnosis allows clients to make contact with younger parts of themselves in a supportive way (Watkins and Watkins, 1997). Research suggests that combining hypnosis with psychotherapy can enhance outcomes across a range of difficulties, particularly when it comes to regulating emotions and processing painful experiences (Kirsch, Montgomery and Sapirstein, 1995; Montgomery, DuHamel and Redd, 2000). Contemporary neuroscience also highlights hypnosis as a powerful means of focusing attention and shaping inner experience (Oakley and Halligan, 2013). Techniques such as imagery rescripting have been shown to help people revisit and update difficult childhood experiences (Arntz and Weertman, 1999), and findings from memory reconsolidation research suggest that such updates can be lasting (Lane et al., 2015). This article introduces a phased, trauma-informed way of working with BSS using hypnotherapy, with a particular focus on inner child work, stabilisation, and integration.

Adult presentations

When working with clients who experienced boarding school, you may notice fluent narrative yet thin feeling language, quick shifts to problem-solving, a preference for autonomy, and a wariness of reliance. Relationally there can be warmth at a distance, ambivalence about closeness, and a tendency to self-monitor for mistakes. These features are widely described in accounts of Boarding School Syndrome and align with emerging quantitative findings on attachment and care perceptions in ex-boarders (Schaverien, 2011; Schaverien, 2015; Wharton and Marcano-Olivier, 2023).

I have also noted the following carryovers from school to the here-and-now and suggested treatment approaches:

Early separations and term-time goodbyes → normalised aloneness and brisk leave-taking in adult ties → therapy task: build tolerance for need and repair after rupture.

Peer hierarchies and rank culture → achievement as safety, rank sensitivity, perfectionism → therapy task: develop value beyond performance and soften self-criticism.

Institutional routine and stoicism → emotion suppression, action bias, brittle self-reliance → therapy task: expand affect labelling and flexible self-care.

Expectations around communications with home, which were often framed as positive and free of complaint → shame about need, difficulty asking for help → therapy task: de-shame dependency wishes and practise clear asks, work on identifying needs.

Survival friendships and loyalty binds → struggle with boundaries and endings → therapy task: rehearse limits and conscious farewells.

Bowlby (1969) emphasised that children need consistent caregivers to develop secure attachment. Boarding often interrupts this process through sudden separation, repeated term-time goodbyes, and rigid institutional routines. Over time, children may come to see need as weakness and closeness as unsafe. Evidence from early deprivation studies reinforces how such breaks in caregiving can leave a lasting imprint on emotional regulation and social expectations.

This matters in therapy because the boarding school template is often reactivated during major life transitions: forming or ending relationships, becoming a parent, facing bereavement, or navigating work appraisals. In the therapy room, clients may present with a fluent intellectual style but struggle to access feelings. They may want support yet fear dependence. This ambivalence can complicate the therapeutic alliance, with mixed signals about closeness and distance (Schaverien, 2011; Schaverien, 2015).

For clinicians, recognising these traits as adaptations rather than flaws is key. Naming them in this way reduces shame and helps clients see that what once protected them may now carry costs. From here, therapy can focus on practising new responses that integrate the strengths of self-reliance with the capacity for emotional connection.

This shift is also at the heart of embodied practice: working not only with thoughts and narratives but with the felt sense of the body, where these adaptations were first anchored, opens a pathway to reconnecting mind and body.

Hypnotherapy and inner child work

Hypnotherapy offers a uniquely embodied route into the patterns described above. Where talking alone can keep clients in a detached, intellectual mode, hypnosis helps shift attention inward, allowing access to imagery, sensation, and memory networks that hold earlier experience. Within an ego-state framework, hypnotherapy provides a safe, structured way to meet younger parts of the self without pathologising them.

In practice, this means clients can reconnect with the child self that once had to be pushed aside, offer it protection, voice, and choice, and then integrate those experiences into present-day life. This work is especially relevant for boarding school survivors, whose childhood adaptations often live on somatically, outside of conscious awareness.

Boarding School Syndrome Hypnotherapy

A trauma-informed stance suggests working in phases rather than diving straight into painful material. A useful three-step model is:

1. Stabilisation and resourcing

• Establish safety and predictability.

• Normalise BSS traits as adaptations, not flaws.

• Introduce breath work, grounding, safe-place imagery, and ego-strengthening suggestions.

• Co-create choice points in session to counter institutional echoes of compulsion or lack of agency.

2. Inner child contact and repair

• Use gentle bridging (affect bridge, image bridge, or sensory bridge) from current triggers to earlier states.

• Invite the adult self, supported by the therapist, to meet the child self with warmth and validation.

• Explore reparative imagery: offering protection, permission to express feelings, symbolic rituals of goodbye, or letters never sent.

• Keep the focus on symbolic healing rather than factual reconstruction, avoiding suggestion about historical events.

3. Integration and consolidation

• Link insights to daily life through practical experiments: asking for help, setting boundaries, or tolerating closeness.

• Use future pacing to rehearse new patterns in upcoming situations, with both adult and child selves present and resourced.

• Encourage between-session practices such as journalling dialogues with the child part, self-compassion exercises, or grounding techniques.

• Review markers of change together — e.g., reduced intensity of triggers, greater tolerance of intimacy, softer self-talk.

What distinguishes Boarding School Syndrome Hypnotherapy here is the direct mind–body connection. Clients often describe feeling the child self not just as an idea but as a physical presence, a knot in the stomach, a heaviness in the chest, a sudden wave of sadness or relief. By working with these sensations in trance, change happens at the level where the old adaptations were first anchored. This makes the work both deeply personal and experientially convincing.

Practice considerations

Safety and pacing

Work with ex-boarders often stirs strong affect beneath a polished surface. It is essential to pace carefully, especially when clients are unused to sustained contact with their own feelings. Begin with stabilisation and always leave time for debrief and grounding. For example, a client who quickly slipped into an early memory of being dropped at school was brought back to the present by anchoring in the breath and orienting to the room before session end.

Autonomy and choice

Many boarding school survivors have a heightened sensitivity to control, given their childhood experience of rigid routines and loss of agency. Sessions should be rich in opportunities for choice. For instance, the client can be invited to decide whether to keep eyes open or closed during trance. Even these small decisions can begin to repair old patterns of compulsion.

Ethical use of imagery

Imagery work can be evocative, so it is vital not to imply historical fact or suggest events that were never described. Instead, focus on symbolic repair. This might involve the adult self-offering comfort, voice, or protection. The emphasis remains on present-day agency rather than reconstructing childhood details.

Alliance and rupture repair

Clients may oscillate between longing for closeness and pulling away. Normalising this rhythm helps reduce shame. If a rupture arises, such as a client missing a session and returning with guilt, it can be named as part of the boarding school legacy and explored in the here-and-now.

Integration beyond the therapy room

Because BSS adaptations are often praised in professional settings, it helps to ground therapeutic insights in daily life. Encouraging small experiments such as asking a partner for support, setting a boundary at work, or practising self-compassion allows the embodied shifts from hypnosis to be tested and reinforced.

Future directions and conclusion

Although the psychological impact of boarding has been well described in psychodynamic literature, there is still very little empirical research on the use of hypnotherapy with this group. Existing studies show that hypnosis can enhance psychotherapy outcomes more broadly, but systematic trials with ex-boarders are lacking.

Clinically, there is also scope for closer dialogue between therapeutic approaches. Psychodynamic insights have illuminated the roots of boarding adaptations, while cognitive-behavioural methods have offered tools for restructuring beliefs and behaviours. Hypnotherapy sits alongside these, bringing something distinctive through imagery, embodied awareness, and direct access to the child self. Collaboration across modalities may support a more complete and flexible response to this complex presentation.

In conclusion, Boarding School Syndrome reflects adaptations to early separation and institutional living that often persist into adult life. Hypnotherapy, particularly through inner child work, offers a safe and embodied way to reconnect with the parts of the self that were once pushed aside. With careful pacing, ethical use of imagery, and attention to the therapeutic alliance, clients can soften rigid patterns and rediscover both resilience and connection. This area of practice deserves further exploration so that those who carry the legacy of boarding can find pathways to healing.

References:

Alladin, A. (2012) ‘Cognitive hypnotherapy for major depressive disorder’, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 54(4)

Alladin, A. (2013) ‘Healing the wounded self: combining hypnotherapy with ego state therapy’, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 56(1)

Arntz, A. and Weertman, A. (1999) ‘Treatment of childhood memories: theory and practice’, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37(8)

Bowlby, J. (1969) Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books.

Duffell, N. (2000) The Making of Them: The British Attitude to Children and the Boarding School System. London: Lone Arrow Press.

Holmes, E.A. and Mathews, A. (2010) ‘Mental imagery in emotion and emotional disorders’, Clinical Psychology Review, 30(3)

Kirsch, I., Montgomery, G. and Sapirstein, G. (1995) ‘Hypnosis as an adjunct to cognitive-behavioural psychotherapy: a meta-analysis’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(2)

Lane, R.D., Ryan, L., Nadel, L. and Greenberg, L. (2015) ‘Memory reconsolidation, emotional arousal, and the process of change in psychotherapy: new insights from brain science’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38

Montgomery, G.H., DuHamel, K.N. and Redd, W.H. (2000) ‘A meta-analysis of hypnotically induced analgesia: how effective is hypnosis?’, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 48(2)

Oakley, D.A. and Halligan, P.W. (2013) ‘Hypnotic suggestion: opportunities for cognitive neuroscience’, Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Schaverien, J. (2011) ‘Boarding School Syndrome: broken attachments, a hidden trauma’, British Journal of Psychotherapy, 27(2)

Schaverien, J. (2015) Boarding School Syndrome: The Psychological Trauma of the “Privileged” Child. Abingdon: Routledge

Watkins, J.G. and Watkins, H.H. (1997) Ego States: Theory and Therapy. New York: W.W. Norton.

Wharton, N. and Marcano-Olivier, M. (2023) ‘An exploration of ex-boarding school adults’ attachment styles and substance use behaviours’, Attachment & Human Development